Quantcast
Channel: A MOMENT OF CEREBUS
Viewing all 5131 articles
Browse latest View live

Kickstarter: Cerebus Bookplates

$
0
0
Cerebus Trade Paperback Bookplate
'Unsigned', 'Signed'& 'Your Name Hand-Lettered By Dave Sim' Options Available

DAVE SIM:
(from Cerebus Archive Kickstarter Update #6, 21 May 2014)
...Thanks to Alexander Hoffman of Toronto for sending me two Avery labels to sign for him to put in a couple of his CEREBUS trades. I had a bit of time so I sketched Cerebus on each and had him saying "Like HELL it's yours, put it back. This Cerebus trade belongs to Alexander Hoffman". 

Hmm, I thought. I had been looking for what I hoped would be a more generally affordable pledge item.

(The gag actually goes back almost 50 years now, back, back, into the Vanished Mists of Ancient Times to when men used to wear…hats! See, when you went indoors, you took off your hat. As deference to what were then known as "Ladies". I still do this compulsively in the winter even when I'm only going indoors for five minutes. Anyplace that had a cloak room also had a shelf for hats. And a lot of hats looked alike. So gentlemen tended to put an identifying label in the inside of the brim with their name on it. So it was not unknown for you to pick up a hat and check inside to see if it was yours. So, my Dad got this joke label from someone that said "The HELL it's yours. Put it back. This hat belongs to…" and then he wrote Ken Sim in it. His hat would often get a good workout with guys laughing and then pretty much having to show it to other guys to explain, you know, what EXACTLY did you find particularly funny about someone else's hat? As soon as I needed a gag for an identifying label -- well, what could be more a more Cerebus-like sentiment regarding YOUR personal property?)...

Cerebus Archive Kickstarter: Calling All Comic-Retailers!

$
0
0
Cerebus Berserker
Cerebus Archive Number One
Make Your Kickstarter Pledge Now!
Greetings fellow retailer,
My name is Menachem Luchins, owner and manager of Escape Pod Comics in Huntington, NY. I’m reaching out to you today on behalf of Dave Sim, the creator of Cerebus and the upcoming Strange Death of Alex Raymond. Odds are, if you’re getting this e-mail, that you know who Sim is and Cerebus’s part in comic history. As a retailer, you are probably also aware that the first two volumes of the Cerebus phonebooks are out of print.

Sim’s most recent Kickstarter is aimed to solve that problem: all the profits from it will go towards getting the printing issues he’s been having with the digital restoration of those books settled once and for all. The Kickstarter itself is for a wonderful folio of Cerebus Art, each print with a broadsheet style page of commentary by Sim about the creation of the piece featured. The plan is to do a series of these Kickstarters over time, each focusing on a different period in the Cerebus work. This first one is from the earliest period and has 10 prints in it. More details on the Kickstarter page, here.

Now, the retailer level that was added today is for FIVE copies of this limited edition, signed & numbered, version of the folio- retailer copies will also have a “sub-signing” on theirs with their store name (eg: #256 of 500, Night Flight Comics #1 of 5)- at a discount of 35%. I have spoken with Dave and he has informed me that he has no problem with retailers selling the prints individually as well, so your price point for selling is fairly adjustable as well.

Now, concerning the issues about backing Kickstarters that many of us face, I’d like to make a few points.

Fulfillment. We all fear backing Kickstarters because of the horror stories (and sometimes personal experience) of not getting the rewards on time, things being changed, etc etc. Now, I can’t make any promises but… this is Dave Sim we are talking about. On the last kickstarter he was involved with, Sim sent duplicate rewards to many backers JUST IN CASE they had missed something. Beyond that, there is nothing in this kickstarter that doesn’t EXIST, in some form, already. No waiting for the writer to find an artist or the artist to draw the page or the special limited edition cover artist to finish his job.

Diamond. Nothing burns me up like seeing an item I backed on Kickstarter in Diamond only a few months (or weeks!) after I received the book, especially as the traditionally distributed version is usually cheaper and packed in a way that’s easier to sell. Sim WILL be offering this folio through Diamond, eventually. By the time the UNSIGNED and UNNUMBERED version is featured in Previews, though, the Kickstarter for folios 2 and 3 (High Society and Church & State, respectively) will have already passed. Beside for that, the Diamond version of the folio will be MORE EXPENSIVE (retail price) than the Kickstarter one [$89 CAD as opposed to $79 CAD] and, most likely, will be offered at the same 35% discount. This means that when a customer sees the item in Previews, you can tell them that you have it AND THE SECOND FOLIO already, signed and numbered, with the third on the way.

Obligation. One of the things I dislike is when a Kickstarter I backed sends me an email, a year later, asking me to back some NEW Kickstarter completely unrelated to this one. The only Kickstarters you are going to hear about from Dave Sim, as far as I know, are going to be about Cerebus and, as he has parcelled out the Archive Folios in sets of ten, Dave has over 100 years worth of Folios to sell (at 3 a year) so you REALLY don’t need to worry that he’s going to start spamming your email box to back his friends projects or for a brand new story he wants to do with Image Comics.

Lastly: If, in the event we really make an impact on this thing, 200 COPIES of the book are reserved by retailers the discount will drop to 40% for all of us. If we somehow, in the next 8 days before the project ends, get 400 COPIES ordered, it will drop to 45%! I know this seems unlikely to many of you, but I need you to know that I am sending this email to A LOT more retailers than you see listed here. All it takes is a large order from a few of the BIG BOYS like Newbury, Midtown, Jet-Pack and/or Mile High or all of us forwarding this on to our other retailer friends and getting some real word-of-mouth going and it COULD happen.

Right, so… I’ve said my piece. Once again, here is a link to the Kickstarter.


If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanking you for your time,

Menachem Luchins
Escape Pod Comics
EscapePodComics [at] gmail [dot] com

Weekly Update #32: Observations

$
0
0
Cerebus Trade Paperback Bookplate
'Unsigned', 'Signed'& 'Your Name Hand-Lettered By Dave Sim' Options Available

DAVE SIM:
Howdy folks! No Executive Summary this time.  Having read everything Sean wrote (and thank you Sean) and everything George wrote (and thank you, George), I think I know what my lines are.

By the way, I've been waiting for my cheap-o scanner/copier/fax machine to run out of ink as the signal that it's time to go and get another one.  Yes, accepting the fact that that's the age we live in. It's about three years old. It's dead. Get with the program, Dave. And I got the signal that the BLACK INK is dying and I don't have a replacement cartridge.  This could be VERY good news if I'm able to get a scanner/copier/fax machine tomorrow and find out that it's just that the fax attachment died (as the colour printer is now green-striping itself into oblivion).  Otherwise that means that it's the fax connection that is on the fritz and I need to be Home From 9 am to 5 pm For the Bell Person Who Can't Narrow It Down Any Further Than That.

Today actually started with a very light load so I was able -- by about 2 am -- to do a Voyage To The Bottom of The CEREBUS and HIGH SOCIETY Pile and pulled out the original unbound copy of the CEREBUS volume as well as a lengthy fax that I had sent to Josee (Bonjour Josee!) 17 June of last year.

So, a few observations:

1)  At the TIME, I had declared that Signatures 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15 and 16 were parfait!   Perfect (that is).  Which I really didn't think looking at them this time.  I was making allowances: it's never going to be as good as Preney did, so, hey, I'll live with it.  It's been a strange year.  Basically George and Sean -- in different ways -- have half-convinced me that much better quality is possible. But only HALF-convinced me.  And mostly in the sense that to the degree that I believe better quality is possible, I'm not sure what the method is to achieve that better quality.  I'm still looking at two computer churches here.

2)  So I backed off from that a bit and said, "Well, at the very least, I think I need to get Lebonfon to FedEx Sean an unbound copy of CEREBUS and let him have a look at it. And their original scans they deemed to be finished and the scans George deemed to be finished" (which I think might have already been done with the scans: there have been a lot of episodes of As The Pixels Turn and I lose track sometimes).  So I sent Josee a fax at 4:30 this morning asking her to do that. The questions for Sean, it seems to me, would be: how do you think the book looks?  And if you think something's wrong with it, do you have any idea what is wrong?  And do you know how to fix it?

3)  What struck me most, coming at the unbound copy with fresh eyes was how grey the blacks were. And I'm not sure why that is.  Another self-publisher told me they thought Lebonfon had gone downhill around the time that Lisa-Marie left.  And my "quel domage" fax over Lisa-Marie's departure  was in there right when they were printing the unbound copy.  I wondered if I was paranoid, thinking that Lisa-Marie had said, "I don't want to play this anymore. This is going to turn into a nutcracker." Of course, a year later things may have improved.

4)  The biggest complaint that I had about the unbound copy versus the "proofs" was the variance in the tone.  Cerebus is a 30% tone and I have a visual tolerance for a range from 27% to 32% roughly.  I know the difference just from experience...

(a side note on that: at one point I asked Preney if they could manufacture tone for us.  I mean, what's the base cost for an 11x17 transparent adhesive sheet?  So they did it.  Actually put Preneytone at the top in the Letraset typeface. And that was when I figured out how and why Letratone charged that much for tone.  The quality control is very exacting.  I could go through a dozen sheets and say, "This is about 27%, this is about 35%, this is about 28%, this is 30%." So thus ended the experiment. You can't START with 27% and 35% and expect consistent results.)

...and that was something I definitely saw in Allan Harvey's work on A DISTANT SOIL.  He converted the 40% tones to 35% tones.  But it wasn't really AROUND 35% it was pretty much BANG ON 35%.  There was quite a range on the unbound copy of CEREBUS.  The Cerebus on the first page of #2, as a example, was definitely in the 40% range and then dropped to 30% on the subsequent pages.

5) I can see what George is saying:  We got it down to 111 problem pages out of 1,000 pages.  But, as I say, looking back at the book almost a year later, I don't think the track record was as good as that.  Again, it's Dave Sim, publisher ("Is the average fan going to see this?") versus Dave Sim artist ("This just isn't accurate and I'm not sure which is the better course of action if it can't be made accurate: just let it go because people want to read it or let it go into suspended animation until I'm certain of the results:  and just stick with CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER ONE, NUMBER TWO, NUMBER THREE, etc. because there I can see, it's either accurate or so close to accurate that I have no problem with quality control.  We're on it." I've thought a few times, Steve Ditko has let MR.A go out of print for years at a time. It sure hasn't hurt the demand or the cachet of ALL published versions of MR.A.  Does being a good custodian of the material mean being a slave to the material?)

6)  There are still CALLS that have to be made on CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER ONE, but I've made most of them while being open to Sean tweaking them.  The same choices that Heritage Auctions makes with their catalogue (which, to me, is the best reproduction in the field).  There are yellow pages.  If you don't SHOOT it AS yellow, you're going to miss what's actually there (the latest catalogue there's a Jack Kirby/Vince Colletta THOR cover that is YELLOW.  But most of the other Kirby pieces around it are white).  And there are WHITE CEREBUS pages. The page from #18 and the page from #22 are white pages.  Darkened up a bit so you can see the white paint on the #22 page AS white paint.  But not darkened up enough to show it as whiter than the page  As Ger and I got better, MOST of the pages are white.  You can bring up minor discolouration, but you're going to have to make the whole thing too dark (in my opinion) to show that that's a blob of white-out there.  These are choices that can't really be made on the trade paperback without intruding on the reading experience.  It's a much narrower window where you want the blacks to be black, the whites to be white and all of the lines to be there.

7)  I'm not saying This Is The Case: but that seems to me to be the problem with "batch conversion" -- we might not be there YET with the technology.  We might get there in a year or in ten years.  I'm very wary of agreeing to anything that costs $60,000 with the potential of going, "Oh, gosh. Who knew that that would be a keystroke come 2017?  Sorry, Kickstarter people!"

8)  But PART of me goes, well, isn't that what these quarterly Kickstarters, arguably, are all about? If we can keep 200 or so people psyched about making this happen, can't we, arguably, waste tens of thousands of dollars going, WHELP, THAT sure wasn't it.  I mean, living WAY below the poverty line in any conventional sense -- walking an extra five blocks to get carrots for $1 instead of $1.49?  It's. A. Little. Weird. To. THEN. Say: "Okay Sean, 'batch convert' four signatures in CEREBUS and get your people to tweak them. Here's $20,000." I'm not ruling it out, I'm just saying it's a little weird. MORE than a little weird. I'd feel like I was the government or something.  :)

9)  Likewise with the "tweaks and adjustments 10 minutes per page".  The bottom line to me on that is that you have to see it printed out and you have to see the printer's "A" game.  And it's occurred to me that that's a major problem here.  I'm the one who says "LAUNCH" and then I'm the one who has to pay the multi-thousand dollar invoice -- first for scanning and tweaking and then for printing.  I mean, I'm not naive enough to say, "Okay, Sean -- if I don't like how it looks, YOU pay the printing bill, right?" Or George.  The buck -- the tens of thousands of bucks -- stops here.

10) At the very least, I think I'm going to get Lebonfon to ship however-many signature #1s from the CEREBUS volume to John Funk and John will throw one in With Every CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER ONE Package Ordered!  Just think of it as my way of saying, "Hey, thanks, CEREBUS fans for giving me the chance to treat money the way, you know, The Pentagon does! Have a misprinted signature!  On me!"

Thanks to Alastair who signed the petition 19 hours ago, Daniel Callahan who signed it four days ago and Justin Wallner who signed it 6 days ago.

And thanks for all the birthday best wishes last week!  I forgot that was going to be in the mailbox today!

And thanks to everyone who bid on the DOCTOR WHO and THUNDER AGENTS covers.  Coming soon -- but not TOO soon:  glamourpuss art auctions!

Cerebus & The Guys

$
0
0
GERHARD:
(from Gerhard Art)
Another example of me adding a background to a 30 year old Cerebus drawing, done on typing paper.

Cerebus At The Great Wall

$
0
0

BRIAN COPPOLA:
This was a huge (2x3') drawing of Cerebus done in 1983 by Dave Sim... As far as I know, I kicked off the idea of having Gerhard go back in and fill up the white space on an old Sim drawing. The concept has definitely caught on as a thing. 

(via Comic Art Fans)

Cerebus: In My Life - Kevin Harrison

$
0
0
Cerebus (Convention Sketch, 2006)
Art by Dave Sim
KEVIN HARRISON:
I accidentally haggled my way into an amazing deal on a full set of Cerebus issues today, so I thought I would take a moment, not only to answer this, but to confront my own feelings regarding Dave Sim, Cerebus, and in general my feelings about following the work of someone who would publicly state things I might find privately detestable. 

It was 1987, and I had a summer job delivering pizza flyers.  I was only 12, so money meant one thing:  more comic books.  X-Men, GI Joe, and Spider-Man, mostly.  There were a couple older guys who had the same job -- and a car! -- and once, while driving us to another neighborhood, I found a copy of Cerebus underneath the backseat.

I thought he looked like a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle. (TMNT was a name I couldn't help but notice at the comic shop, but it was placed in the out-of-reach, mature section due to its hyper-violence -- that's right, the Turtles definitely weren't for kids back then.)

"Yeah, they did a crossover, but Cerebus is better.  He's got this badass sword, and he can kick anyone's ass.  It's way better than that X-Shit you're into," one of told me.

Of course, years later I realized that that this would've been right around issue 100 so towards the end of Church & State, and Cerebus -- with a few notable exceptions -- was more involved in the drudgery of running a religion than in ass kicking.

Since I wasn't even a teenager yet, I didn't pay him any mind, and even then I didn't give much credence to the words of elitists.

But I started noticing Cerebus on the shelves of comic book stores. Sometimes I'd flip through an issue or two, lost in 20 page increments that were clearly (and confusingly) part of a larger narrative, and wrapped inside a cover that seemed more eloquent than anything that had ever previously graced a comic book rack.

When I was 16, I bought the first Cerebus collection on a whim...then the second, then the third. Pretty soon, I was caught up with the regular series and collecting issues of Women, but leaving them unread in a stack to be read in the latest 'phone book' collections.

All of this waiting wore me down after a dozen issues or so, and instead of buying monthly issues, I would catch up with the volumes I was missing every few years, rereading the entire story from the beginning.

I think I petered out around Rick's Story (though, I have Going Home).

And now, as of today today, I have all of the issues.

I can't pretend to imagine how Cerebus has influenced me creatively, but it's been immense.  The idea of story arcs within story arcs within story arcs.  Of fitting non-sequeters, asides, fictionalized real people (and fictionalized fictional people), and sliding wildly between comedy, drama, analysis, intensity, and just taking your fucking time with something instead of forcing it.

Most of all, no one paces like Sim, and few people ever approach that level of sheer craftsmanship.  I've brought artists to tears showing them the sketch of the Regency from the cover of High Society and explaining this was cranked out in a week or less by a guy while he wrote and drew 20 pages of (sometimes equally detailed) comics every month (plus a cover), and all while reading and replying to virtually all of his fan (and not so fan) mail.

Sim taught me that focus, attention to detail, and consistency meant that you could create a world that could contain everything.  Every genre, every concept, every character, every reflection, belief, strife, and joy...sort of just like our own world, except Cerebus has more Lord Julius in it.

And because of Sim, many of the creators I discovered during, after, and even before Cerebus were people who may never have taken their first steps (and sometimes final missteps) into publishing:  Martin Wagner, Shannon Wheeler, Stephen Murphy & Michael Zulli, Colleen Doran, Eddie Campbell, and Jeff Smith to name a frightfully tiny number of them.

I think of Dave Sim's fine, detailed lines, and sweeping story, and I wonder how I ever concerned myself with debates on whether The New Mutant's Cannonball would ever be ready to lead The X-Men...

When I was 19, I met Dave Sim at a con.  We showed up late, and he told us he was supposed to be at a panel, but that he would sign one book for each of us, and that if we came back tomorrow he'd give us free sketches.  (The very concept of free sketches by a major, working professional seems almost laughable, but Sim did them for every fan who asked.)

He was nice and personable to a fault.  This was NOT the Sim I'd been used to reading in his letter columns:  A clever, funny guy who loved being a jerk when he could get away with it.  Nor was he the Sim we've all read about with numerous, long-standing feuds with several people who were once close to him.  This was just a nice guy who loved his work, and loved making time for the people who enjoyed what he did.

Since we could only get one autograph, I picked my favorite of Sim's work:  Jaka's Story.

Here, in Jaka's Story, were the best elements of all Sim's work:  Social commentary, religion, autobiography, politics, art, parody (including regular appearances by Oscar Wilde, Groucho Marx, and Margaret Thatcher), repression, the nature of art (or, I think more exactly, the nature of being), and love (in all its most difficult forms.)  The story lacks some of the intensity characterized in earlier Cerebus works, but what Jaka's Story lacks in action, it more than makes up for in life, humor, horror, and magic...mostly magic.

Sim also doesn't shy away from the gender politics that take front seat in (and alienate many from) some of his later work, but rather incorporates those elements directly into a tiny story about five characters living on an isolated path along a mountain side, in the days following a (temporary) apocalypse.

And let's be clear:  Sim has issues with women, which he makes very clear in the next story arcs.

So, what does that make me, as a purchaser (and likely enjoyer) of 300 issues of Cerebus, the vast body of text written by Sim, and one of the longest running narratives in human history?

I don't think it makes me anything.

Honestly, I don't think I have to justify myself for enjoying someone else's expression that doesn't gibe with my own feelings on an issue.  Sim is not without misstep by any means, but few books have the beauty, elegance, imagination, or sheer craft of any single issue of Cerebus.

I will be the first to admit Sim's faults, and the last to defend them.  As I will with Lovecraft, Chaplin, or pretty much anyone who played rock'n'roll between the 1950s and 1970s.

Most of us who have something to say, and tremendous arguments to make (whether veiled in fiction or more straightforwardly via essay) do that because WE ARE FLAWED, and we are lucky to find that wormhole of accessibility that allows others into our reality (and vice versa.)

More than that, I'm not interested in the sum total contents and values that are already contained within my head.  If you have something to say, and you can say it cleanly and concisely and brilliantly, I may still disagree with you, but I'd like to hear it.  I will enjoy hearing it, and hopefully I will learn something hearing it...even if that "something" only reinforces that I disagree with you.

I think that's something that we really lose in the modern world.  It's easy to live in a vacuum without real provocation or acceptance or synthesis by/of those we might find repugnant on paper.  Worse, I think we're turned off by the idea that in the right hands those ideas that we find repugnant might actually look beautiful on paper.

And that is power of magic.  Of comics.  And of Cerebus.

This article first appeared on Kevin's Tumblr: Tales Of Drunkenness & Cruelty.

Cover Parodies: Weird Following Cerebus

$
0
0
Original: Weird Science-Fantasy #29 (EC Comics, May 1955) by Frank Frazetta
Tribute: Following Cerebus #3 (Win-Mill Productions, February 2005) by Dave Sim & Gerhard
(Click image to enlarge)
FOLLOWING CEREBUS:
(from Following Cerebus #3, February 2005)
This is based on Weird Science-Fantasy #29 (EC Comics, May 1955) by Frank Frazetta. The cover has been called the greatest comic book cover of all time, and we wouldn't argue with that assessment. Frazetta has often spoken about the history behind this cover -- that it was drawn quickly and intended as a Buck Rogers cover for Famous Funnies (he drew the covers to issues 209-216 from 1953-1955) but publisher William Gaines turned it down (too violent, as we recall). Frazetta made some slight alterations (so that the central character didn't look as much like Buck Rogers) and sold it as WSF -- but only on the condition that Frazetta got to keep the original artwork (which was not done in those days). Gaines balked but couldn't deny the quality of the cover and so bought it anyway. (Marie Severin provided the beautiful coloring job on the original comic.)

Cover Parodies: Dialectic Comics

$
0
0
Original: Detective Comics #31  (DC Comics, September 1939) by Bob Kane
Tribute: Following Cerebus #3 (Win-Mill Productions, February 2005) by Dave Sim & Gerhard
(Click image to enlarge)
FOLLOWING CEREBUS:
(from Following Cerebus #3, February 2005)
Detective Comics #31 (DC Comics, September 1939) featured just the third Batman cover ever. DC's Batman Archives edition does not identify a cover artist, though it's almost certainly Bob Kane, the original artist of the strip. It perfectly captures the early menacing atmosphere surrounding Batman. Neal Adams did his own version of this cover for Batman #227 (November 1970).

Cover Parodies: Dave 'n' Ger's

$
0
0
Original: Avengers #4 (Marvel Comics, March 1964) by Jack Kirby & George Roussos
Tribute: Following Cerebus #3 (Win-Mill Productions, February 2006) by Dave Sim & Gerhard
(Click image to enlarge)
FOLLOWING CEREBUS:
(from Following Cerebus #3, February 2006)
The Jack Kirby / George Roussos cover for Avengers #4 (Marvel Comics, March 1964) featured the return of Captain America (he'd disappeared from the comics scene for a decade) and was such a powerful image that the design has been used over and over (including a nice version recently by Alex Ross for a deluxe print).

Weekly Update #33: Square One

$
0
0
Previously on 'A Moment Of Cerebus':
Dave Sim, working with George Peter Gatsis, has remastered the first two collected volumes of Cerebus to restore details and quality in the artwork lost over the thirty years since they were originally published (as detailed here and here). After Cerebus' original printer Preney Print closed its doors, Dave Sim moved his printing to Lebonfon in 2007 as at that time they were still capable of working with photographic negatives and making printing plates as Preney had done. And then Lebonfon switched to digital scanning and printing - a technology which struggles to faithfully reproduce Cerebus' tone without creating moire patterns (as detailed in Crisis On Infinite Pixels). Dave Sim continues his search for a workable solution to this problem, which is delaying the reprinting of the Cerebus and High Society collections (as detailed in Collections Stalled). Now read on...
Cerebus #112/113 (July/August 1988)
Art by Dave Sim & Gerhard
DAVE SIM:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This week I'm going to be replying to Sean Robinson's post from last Friday with my reasons that I'd like him to do a close assessment of an unbound copy of the CEREBUS trade which (God willing) Lebonfon has already sent him.

Hi Sean!

Thanks for your posting last week.  As is usually the case with me, it requires actually getting back to or close to "Square One" -- in this case potentially having all or most of the money, thanks to the AMAZING generosity of the Kickstarter pledge partners --  for me to start thinking coherently about where, exactly, Square One is.

In this case, that seemed to me to be:  okay, how good or bad is the CEREBUS volume (volume one) as it stands right now? And it seemed to me that you were potentially a very good judge of that because you're such a big fan of my work (and thank you for that!) and you have quite a bit of experience in reproduction in 2014 both in your "day job" and with babysitting your own comics projects -- with LOTS of tiny little lines -- for 100% accurate reproduction.

In short, you should have been sent an unbound copy of CEREBUS some time ago.

Lebonfon, based on my own assessment of a year ago, makes the point that there are far fewer pages that need to be corrected on the CEREBUS volume than on the HIGH SOCIETY volume.

So, one of the things that I'd like to hear from you is:  do you think that's the case?  Looking at the book as a fan of the cartooning on CEREBUS, as a fellow artist and someone already familiar with the book: as a fan of CEREBUS itself.

I'm recommending a head-to-head comparison, going page by page with your own copy of the CEREBUS trade or with CEREBUS back issues or both.
Cerebus Vol 1, Page 205
Before & After
There's a lot of heavy lifting that George Gatsis has already done.  I was just checking again the tops of pages 205-206 (originally in issue 9, the sword fight between Cerebus and K'Cor) which had been in need of restoration since...issue 9 came out if I'm not mistaken. The line work is still missing on most of the backgrounds (it would be GREAT if those pages ever came onto the market!) but George has carefully cloned CEREBUS lettering and replaced pretty much every word. That isn't something that just happens on its own.
Cerebus Vol 1, Page 206
Before & After
You've remarked yourself on the amount of clean-up that George has done, including replacing the banners on all of the splash pages and sharpening the corners.

So, obviously, we want to retain all of that.

(and it also needs to be said that George and I have both "written off" the entire issue #12 that I did in duo-shade. It's as good -- which is to say terrible -- as it's ever going to be. I have thought of completely redrawing it, but I don't draw that way now and haven't for over 30 years, so it would be a matter of making something really bad into something even worse or as bad in a different way).  

But there ARE other questions:

For example, we are coming down to crunch time on culpability:  where there are flaws are they, in your view, George's fault or Lebonfon's fault primarily? i.e. how bad is the printing job itself? You've already said that you think, from your experience with pre-press, that Lebonfon should have contacted me when they saw the digital files and alerted to me as to what the printing was apt to look like. Which was very helpful to the guy (me) who has to make these judgement calls about culpability without expertise in digital pre-press.

Or is the job that bad at all? This is where I need another set of eyes that aren't those of the guy that drew them and which are as familiar (if not more familiar) with the original artwork than with the reproduced form of the work. Which stands to reason.  I spent the better part of a day or two looking at the original artwork while creating it while I probably spent less time with the printed copy than the average reader!

The printing on the CEREBUS trade will soon be paid for.  Which means whatever you think is USABLE of the PRINTED signatures -- which is what you will be looking at in the unbound printed copy, is something we won't have to pay for on the second round. I'd prefer that you not refer back to my own list of "parfait" signatures, but do your own assessment, as I say, head-to-head.

I mean, even being as brutal as you can be about what's there on the printed page, if even ONE signature is viable and (another question) if you think Lebonfon is viable as a printer, then that's one signature that we won't have to pay for on the next around (assuming that we ARE sticking with Lebonfon: which hasn't been established).

Be as specific as you can be.  It'll make for a LONG post, I know, but that way I can do screen captures and then go through my own unbound copy (and George can go through his) checking what it is that you're talking about.  And then we can offer our own agree/disagree assessments on each item.

What I'm trying to avoid is just forging ahead and incurring another $10,000 printing bill -- or most of another $10,000 printing bill (if we stick with Lebonfon).

I go on the basis of "what sticks with me" reading people's comments.  One of the things that has stuck with me from your recent comments was the results of scanning pages from the printed books at 2400 dpi -- that the line work was breaking up at 600 dpi and 1200 dpi but that at 2400 dpi they looked like enlargements from the books themselves.  Which sounded good to me  :).

Which leads me to ask: are we over-thinking this?  In terms of simplicity and guaranteed results are we better just scanning the printed books at 2400 dpi and -- anywhere that there's a visible flaw in the printed page -- then retreating to negatives or the original artwork (where possible)?

As you've also said, Who is going to notice the kind of flaws that we're talking about besides you, me, George and maybe a handful of other people?  And that's definitely part of the call I'm asking you to make.

But -- let me put it this way -- as a VERY fine-line pen and ink artist, you're aware of the experience of looking at someone else's reproduced work for inspiration.  And, I'm sure, you're also aware that that tends to be a "where the rubber hits the road moment" when you start looking closely and realize that you can use THIS reproduction in THIS book to see what's actually going on.  Whereas THAT reproduction in THAT book just isn't clear enough to do that kind of assessment or derive that kind of assessment. "I thought I could use this when I saw it in the bookstore but that was just wishful thinking." I had that experience back when I used to go to The Beguiling in Toronto.  A big book on Comic Art with a beautiful reproduction of a 1956 RIP KIRBY strip shot from the original artwork and reproduced quite large.  Do I pay $79 for a coffee table book with ONE IMAGE that I actually want? I decided no and I've regretted it ever since.

Or with images on the Internet.  They LOOK clear on Google Image, but as soon as you print them out or try to enlarge them on the screen, they go fuzzy in a hurry.

So, I'd definitely like to know if this unbound printing of CEREBUS falls into a THIS book or THAT book category.  Or if ALL of it does or MOST of it does or WHICH SIGNATURES do.

Thanks for your work on the bookplate.  Good call on the size of dot on Cerebus.  You really ARE a Cerebus fan.  It'll be interesting to see yours and George's work on a single sheet of Avery labels.

To all of you:  hope to hear from some of you tomorrow as the CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER ONE Kickstarter comes to an end.  I'll be (God willing) in the "COMMENTS" section from 4:30 to 8 pm.  I'll be answering COMMENTS from #37 and up if you want to "get a jump" on everyone. John will also be tuning in to answer any questions you have about your pledge items and George will be there for a special announcement at 6 pm!

Dave Sim's Kickstarter: Ends Today!

Kickstarted! Cerebus Archive Number One!

$
0
0

DAVE SIM:
(from the Kickstarter Q&A, 31 May 2014)
How much has fan support exceeded expectations on this Kickstarter? WILDLY!! I mean, it isn't on a scale with STAR TREK fans bringing the television show back from the dead and getting a movie made. But in its own way, it's all the more impressive. 272 people paying down The Lebonfon Printing Debt in one go (assuming that we don't run across any hidden expenses that eat up the whole $32,500 -- that's not something that we're going to know until we walk through it). I mean, it really was -- and IS -- a matter of "I've taken CEREBUS about as far as I can go. I'll KEEP going -- but now it's up to the fans to establish how FAST and how FAR we can move ahead." 

Pretty fast and pretty far, as it turns out. :)


CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER ONE
THE KICKSTARTER BACKERS
Adrian Duma -- Alan Stephen -- Alister Blake -- Andreas Kraft -- Andrew Bartel -- Andrew Boscardin -- Andrew Holt -- Andrew Lariviere -- Andrew Lohmann -- Andrew Wilson -- Andy Davies -- Angela Chng -- Anne Jones -- Anthony Edwards -- Anthony Houge Dunlop -- Anwar Ganama -- Ari Koivuniemi -- B -- Bagoombah -- Beanbag Amerika -- Beaudette Tristan -- Ben Le Foe -- Bill Kraut -- Bill Ritter -- B'jamin da Bass -- Bob Bretall -- Bob Chapman -- Børre -- Brett J. Brucklacher -- Brian Eckfeld -- Brian J. McCall -- BrianDenham -- Brooke Devine -- Cameron Davis -- Car50n -- Carl Hommel -- Cerdic Grimbly -- Charles Armstrong -- Charles Nilsen -- Charles Rowles -- Chris Allingham -- Chris Mannes -- Chris McClelland -- Christopher Day -- Colin M. Strickland -- Collector's Shangri-La -- CON -- Cory Foster -- Craig Gunderstorm -- Curt Rissmiller -- Dagon James -- Damin J. Toell -- Dan Schmidt -- Daniel Callahan -- Daniel Elvén -- Daniel Preece -- Daniel Theodore -- Daniel W. Cisek -- Daryl Davis -- Das -- David Banks -- David Birdsong -- David Blumer -- David Gray -- David Lamontagne -- David Marsh -- David Rankin -- David Shaw -- Dean Edney -- Dean Reeves -- Docmac -- Dominick Grace -- Don Alsafi -- Don Koch -- Don Smith -- Doug Bissell -- Drew Woodworth -- Dustin Cissell -- E G -- Ed Boyle -- Ed Wilson -- Eddie -- Eric Berry -- Eric Fennessey -- Erik van Oosten -- Florian Schiffmann -- Frankie -- Frankie Ramirez -- Future Pastimes -- Gabriel McCann -- Gary DeWulf -- Gary Dunaier -- George Peter Gatsis -- Gestalt Comics -- Giorgio Soldi -- Glen -- Gordon Burnett -- Greg Kessler -- Greg Rosa -- Gregory Benton -- Halhan -- Iain Ross -- Isobel -- Jack Kusler -- Jacqui Mercado -- Jake A. Capps -- James Coniglio -- James Moore -- Jamie Tanner -- Jan Elvsén -- Jarret Cooper -- Jason Boyd -- Jason Dougherty -- Jason Ford -- Jason Lempka -- Jason Penney -- Jason Sacks -- Jason Sperber -- Jason Trimmer -- Jay Perry -- J Cork -- Jeff Boison -- Jeff Constable -- Jeff Seiler -- Jeffrey Flam -- Jeffrey Grill -- Jeramy B Lamanno -- Jesse Lee Herndon -- Jesse Nelson -- Joe Field -- Joe Gutierrez -- Joel DiGiacomo -- John Boreczky -- John Brainard -- John Carmine -- John Dalzell -- John Long -- John Mosher -- John Osmon -- John Simms -- John Tinkess -- John Waclawski -- John Young -- Jon Hill -- Jonas -- Jonathan Hamlow -- Jonathan Rutledge -- Jonathan White -- Jose de Leon -- Joshua Leto -- JR Riley -- Julian Orr -- Kai Ylijoki -- Keith Callbeck -- Keith Young -- Kendall Swafford -- Kent Kowalski -- Kevin Kairys -- Kevin P. -- KevinR -- Kimmo Puhakka -- Kirk Spencer -- L Jamal Walton -- Larry Wooten -- Lee Thacker -- Leonard Wong -- Linda Stevens -- Linkmachinego -- Lorraine Capps -- Lou Valenti -- Luc de Chancenotte -- Luke Crane -- Lunaro -- Marc Laming -- Marc Lynch -- Marco Giuntoni -- Margaret Liss -- Marioeverardo -- Marios Poulimenos -- Mark Byzewski -- Mark Kadas -- Martin Waterman -- Marty Trengove -- Matt Daniel -- Matt Dow -- Matthew Barber -- Matthew Cettei -- Matthew Edwards -- Matthew Price -- Matthias Kraft -- Menachem Luchins -- Michael J McIntyre -- Michael Lucas -- Michael Polo -- Michael R Romano -- Michael Ragiel -- Miguel Corti -- Miguel Ruiz -- Mike Hunt -- Mike Kitchen -- Mike Lee -- Mike Losso -- Mike Ortiz -- Mint City Comics -- Morten S. Eriksen -- Murray Roach -- Nathan Cubitt -- Nathaniel Oberstein -- Neil Campbell -- Nick Hines -- Nick Pendleton -- Night Flight Comics -- Nolan -- Norman Jaffe -- Olav Beemer -- Palac -- Patrick Hess -- Patrick Taylor -- Paul Powers -- Paul Ripley -- Peter Stein -- Phill Warren -- Pyroflam -- Rafer Roberts -- Ragged Claws Network -- Rajesh Shah -- Randy Wood -- Richard Meehan -- Rob Barnes -- Robbie Foggo -- Robert H Lambert -- Robert Mino -- Roberto Accinelli -- Robin Farley -- Rostow -- Russel Dalenberg -- Samuel Fiddian -- Scott Kruse -- Scott Lazerus -- Scott Yoshinaga -- Sean Canning -- Sebastien Roy -- Shaun -- Shaun Pryszlak -- Shiri Rokshin -- Sigrid Smitt-Jeppesen -- Sordel -- Stephen -- Stephen Dennis -- Steve Harold -- Stuart Martin -- Taylor Ramsey -- Terry Stewart -- The Amazombie -- Thiery Adam -- Thuy Nguyen -- Tieg Zaharia -- Tim Burdick -- Tim Hall -- Tim Klassen -- Tim McEwen -- Tim Phillips -- Tim W -- Tobias Glister -- Tom Bither -- Tom Palmer Jr -- Tony Solomun -- Travis Pelkie -- Trevor Towers -- Troy Thompson -- Truls Arnegaard -- Utter Fool -- Vitas Povilaitis -- Warsaw Wolf -- Wayne Welgush -- Xavier Hugonet -- Zane Zielinski 

Source: Kicktraq
(Click image to enlarge)

Bootlegging The Bootleggers

$
0
0

DAVE SIM:
(from the Kickstarter Q&A, 31 May 2014)
I thought it was a great idea that George had that for the "digital inside front cover" of each issue, he wanted me to write something and then fax it to him so he could run it as a fuzzy fax in each trade. What says 'Dave Sim In The Twenty-First Century' like a fuzzy fax? This is the culmination of the Bootlegging the Bootleggers program. Of course, the net effect might be just giving the Bootleggers cleaned up digital copies to resell!

Welcome To The Future!

Dave Sim: The Kickstarter Q&A

$
0
0
The following Q&A with Dave Sim took place on 31 May 2014 in the final hours of the Cerebus Archive Number One Kickstarter campaign, with questions being posed by the Kickstarter pledgers. The following is an edited / reordered version of the full Q&A which can be found in the Kickstarter Comments section.

ON CEREBUS
DAMIN J. TOELL:
Do you feel that anything is lost from the experience when someone only reads the phonebooks?

DAVE SIM:
Yes, in a sense, I think that people miss a lot of the CEREBUS experience just reading the phonebooks, but then they also miss the experience of waiting for a month BETWEEN issues even if they're reading the individual issues. And it not being, you know, the mid-1980s anymore. It was definitely "of its time": Notes from the President, the newest 20 pages, the letters pages.

"You should have been there!" Dr. Winston O'Boogie

JEFFREY FLAM:
Are there any regrets storyline-wise, that Cerebus took, that looking back on it so many years later you wished you hadn't taken with the book? Not what you would do differently now, just wondering if there any paths you would've changed direction on?

DAVE SIM:
That's actually a more interesting question than you would suspect, touching on predestination and free will. I mean, I pretty much decided that Cerebus being who Cerebus was, he could really only follow one path in life. His obsession with Jaka would always pull him in that direction even though it was a VERY BAD idea. That's what I wanted to show him and the reader: look, this is how this goes. And knowing that Cerebus...and the readers...really didn't CARE! They just wanted Cerebus and Jaka to be together. Well, okay. But that ends up the way that it ends up the way it ended up. Happy now? Well, it's not as if I didn't warn you. Cerebus just didn't have the personality profile to be Mr. Jaka, which is who you have to be if you're going to be with her.

What I didn't realized was that I was talking about myself as well -- creator and creation. The more I became aware of predestination and free will as realities -- make that Realities -- the more I realized that I was setting a course for myself. Given who I am -- who I AM -- this is the only way that my life could have ended up. I have free will -- I can do whatever I want, but WANT is a bad way of looking at it, I ultimately realized. I WANT to eat a whole chocolate cake every day. I really WANT to. But it's a VERY BAD idea. It was a whole new way of looking at life. Start with GOOD IDEAS -- this is a GOOD IDEA of how to live. Forget about WANT and DESIRE. Pick from the list. As soon as I started doing that, my life starting improving exponentially.

It's one of the reasons that -- although I'm not really engaged with CEREBUS at any meaningful level in my life -- I definitely think myself obligated to maintain it. Because it got me HERE. Even though HERE is probably not where most CEREBUS fans would have wanted me to end up.

Preserve the intellectual property and the environment it was created in, because I really OWE it to all of you and to all of the people CEREBUS will be important to in the years to come. 6,000 pages are going to be important to different people for different reasons. But you really can't -- responsibly -- diminish importance like that.

It made me very aware of how I think God looks at us. "I can give you that [whatever it is] but it's a BAD IDEA. It leads you the wrong way. Trust me on this one. Humour me." And that's so difficult for us to do. We're so convinced that what we WANT the most is the best for us. THIS will make it all better! Mm. Probably not. "You can get what you want and still not be very happy."

EDDIE KHANNA:
Totally understand if you don't recall, but why is the the final Election Night tally considered the Core Moment in High Society?

DAVE SIM:
I don't think you can beat "Election Night" for a cliffhanger. That's one of those examples of "not really getting the same experience when you don't have to wait a month for the next one". It anticipated, I think, the 2000 election in the U.S. where you can tell that the overall Metaphysics of current Reality is reaching a state of (what would you call it?) Complete Adversarial Equilibrium? We seem to have moved a little ways out of that Reality since 2000 but for a while there it seemed that more elections were photo finishes than weren't. As with most Metaphysics, I'm not sure what that tells us, if anything, but it does seem interesting.

JEFF SEILER:
Since AMOC has been posting those old [Following Cerebus #3] reproduction covers, it occurred to me for the first time while looking at the Frazetta recreation: Did you get any flack from Marvel over doing the Wolveroach character (in multiples) again so many years after the "cease and desist" letter from Shooter? Or do you figure they just didn't see it, since it was a mag not a comic, or that they just didn't care after all those years?

DAVE SIM:
Actually, there never was a cease and desist letter on Wolverroach, I don't think. Was there? I know Jim Shooter came up to me after a panel at a convention. I was still sitting on the panel and -- he's Jim Shooter. I'm sitting down on a dais and he's standing in front of me and we're basically eye to eye. And he leaned forward and said, "About the Wolverroach thing. Next time, give me a call and ask permission, okay?" And I said, SURE! Even though I didn't think I was going to because I was pretty sure the answer would be No. I was also pretty sure that parody was -- and is -- protected free speech. What could they do? Order all copies of issues 54-56 destroyed? All you're going to do is make for One Rare Trilogy of Comic Books.

MARGARET LISS:
What was the name of the tavern near the wall of T'si where Cerebus spent his time during GUYS and later as a 'barkeeper' during RICK'S STORY? I can't find mention of it anywhere. Or is the namelessness of it supposed to serve as a metaphor of all taverns / bars?

DAVE SIM:
When the Cirinists took over and figured out what they were going to do with the taverns, they would have made them into "no name" environments. The idea would have been regimentation. You want a bartender who "toes the line" and you want everyone else killing themselves with alcohol 24 hours a day. Keep It Simple, Stupid.

I don't know if I've ever mentioned this before. You know those little widgets resting against the wall on either side of the front door? That was a signal of the vacancy status of the tavern. There were "this many" beds available. Someone -- and I'm thinking the Eddie Campbell character is a likely suspect -- seeing that Cerebus didn't KNOW that, moved all of the widgets to show "no vacancy". Which is why the tavern went from busy to DEAD. Not that it really affected Cerebus. He had a lot of solo fuming and sulking to do.

JAKE CAPPS:
What books, poems, essays, films, and albums should I find to better appreciate/understand Cerebus?

DAVE SIM:
Let me see: Scott Fitzgerald, I would read THE BEAUTIFUL AND DAMNED. Oscar Wilde PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY. Hemingway A MOVEABLE FEAST. To understand the TONE of JAKA'S STORY I WOULD suggest watching the movie version of GYPSY. Jaka of JAKA'S STORY is very much based on Rose Louise. Theodore White's THE MAKING OF THE PRESIDENT 1960.

Norman Mailer. If you don't want to read Mailer himself, I'd suggest MAILER: HIS LIFE AND TIMES. A guy who dealt with a multiplicity of levels to Reality and how people who really only dealt with "here and now" dealt with him. Gore Vidal's essays. Those would be the most influential stuff.

"Near Durham, ON... one of my favourite shots... didn't quite make it as a Going Home cover..."
(from Gerhard's Photo Album)

CEREBUS COVERS
TIM PHILLIPS:
Not sure if this has be covered elsewhere/when, but do you recall the reason for having photo covers for Going Home? Were they taken around Kitchener? It was such striking shift in cover design.

DAVE SIM:
The photo covers were taken around Kitchener. Various places. That's one of the things that's going to be a part of the COVERS book when we get there: where all the photos were taken. Gerhard knows that stuff. One of them was taken by Rose on a visit to France. It was really a matter of both of us running out of gas. Not having to draw a cover -- and in Gerhard's case, do the backgrounds and paint the damn thing! -- was a time saver. Of course that time just got eaten up as soon as we made the decision. It was like paddling on a raft that was being eaten around us by giant sea mammals. Can we get to issue 300 and still have some of the raft left? Some. But not a lot.

TIM PHILIPS:
Is there any news on the Cerebus Covers book coming out?

DAVE SIM:
I'd be guessing as to what is going on with the CEREBUS COVERS book. I got some pages from Scott Dunbier that are very basic. I think what needs to happen is that I have to get some full-sized photocopies done of the material that's too big for my colour copier and then do mock-ups of the first 10 or 12 pages to show Scott what I'm thinking of. I want to, as an example, do an exhaustive look at the cover of #1, all the different versions and forms there have been of it, including the counterfeit and the only copy that's cut to comic-book size, the cover of CEREBUS ARCHIVE #1, the 2004 Christmas card, etc. I want to DO the cover of #1 and then never have to do it again. Scott, I think, is thinking of it purely as an art book. We have to have a discussion about it at some point. But, I think, right now everyone at IDW is more inclined for me to keep working on THE STRANGE DEATH OF ALEX RAYMOND now that they can see how slow I've gotten. Let's finish one project instead of having several unfinished projects. I'm guessing. Once we have some answers, I think I can turn in a few pages of the COVERS book at the same rate as SDOAR -- basically the way that I did glamourpuss and CEREBUS ARCHIVE at the same time.


LIFE AFTER CEREBUS
MINT CITY COMICS:
How difficult was it to put Cerebus to bed (coffin?) and move on to the next portion of your creative career?

DAVE SIM:
How difficult was it to put Cerebus to bed (or his coffin)? Not really difficult at all. Again, that's a matter of predestination. When you know your character is coming to an end in March 2004, it gives you plenty of time to get completely adjusted to it. And it also gave me a better perspective on my own mortality. I have a fixed life of a fixed duration. I can't add or subtract a minute from it. In the fourth dimension, it's all already happened and it has gone a specific way. All that really matters is self-improvement. I can change anything in the construct. I haven't had a drink in 11 years but I can, if I choose, go out and get stinking drunk tonight. I either did or I didn't. The same way that I had my last drink January 24, 2003. Had you asked me at the time, "So how long do you think that's going to last" I would have said, "Probably not very long." But it turns out that it was eleven years. It was always eleven years. It will always be eleven years. God willing it's the rest of my life.

Predestination: that's what has always happened. Free will: I could have changed it at any moment in the last eleven years -- or in the rest of my life.

In terms of my creative career, when I had to start glamourpuss in order to raise money to repurchase Gerhard's share of the company, I thought, "It's too soon for this." That is, the level of animosity was still WAY HIGH! I only get one chance at a second chance after CEREBUS. 2008 was too soon. But I needed the money. It made things difficult and still makes things difficult in a way. But, Difficulty R Us. When things seem to get easier is when I start to worry. What's going on? What am I missing here?

JAMES MOORE:
I love seeing Cerebus in the "modern" world, like the few spots in the Guide to Publishing, or the pics of him in his hockey gear... any chance of us ever seeing him in the "real" world for 8 pages or so? After Strange Death, naturally.

DAVE SIM:
It was always interesting drawing Cerebus in a modern setting. Hmm. Maybe 8 pages of Cerebus walking around downtown Kitchener? Try and pick places that might stick around for a while. Like City Hall. Market Square (from SPAWN 10) is still there, but Peter's Place burned down back in '94. I actually get my hair cut at Black and White barbers which is pretty much where Peter's Place used to be.

I'm "blue skying" I'm afraid. To the extent that I think about doing other creative work the length of time it takes for me to do it militates against something as long as 8 pages. Chris Ryall wanted me to draw the X-FILES story I wrote. Which I would have loved to do. But, 8 pages -- that's a month's work these days or close to it.

When I think of doing Other Things, now, it's usually Kickstarter pledge items. Hmm. How about a recreation of the "baby throwing page"? More bang for your buck (so to speak).
 


(Click image to enlarge)

THE STRANGE DEATH OF ALEX RAYMOND
DANIEL W. CISEK:
I live right next to Westport CT [the scene of Alex Raymond's fatal car crash] and just wanted to let you know that if you need anything in the way of research from the area (photos or what-have-you), for The Strange Death, I'd be more than happy to oblige.

DAVE SIM:
You know, I might take you up on the Westport offer. I've been in contact with the Westport Police Department and actually got some information from them, including the original accident report and Stan Drake's official statement. Both of which figure prominently in the narrative. There were a few other leads I was trying to track down through Arlen Schumer (who IS in Westport) and a friend of his. But -- to be honest -- that's a WAYS down the road from where I am. And since it's all Official Stuff that has been in place since 1956, I figure it's not going anywhere.

I've gone back and forth on the idea that it's worth my while to go down to Westport and look at the accident site. Arlen took a bunch of photos for me and...I'm not seeing it. We've talked about it on the phone quite a bit and I get the impression that it's one of those distorted environments that doesn't show up on photos the way it actually looks. Like Dealey Plaza in Dallas. It looks sprawling and sloped in the photos. But when you're there it's the size of a postage stamp. Sitting on the concrete platform where Zapruder was standing when he shot his footage and the road is Right There. Not Over There. Okay, so where's the stockade fence? Turn to my right. YI! Right over my shoulder. Again, not WAY over there. If I can justify the expense, I think I do have to see the site of the crash.

JEFFREY FLAM:
This might be a little morbid but what the hey its all in good fun, if there was one comic creator you could bring back to life and have them making comics today...who would it be?

DAVE SIM:
Well as long as we're being MORBID, what about MORBID AND completely  SELF-INTERESTED? In that case, I would like Alex Raymond to come back from the dead and pick up right where he left off on RIP KIRBY. Actually, why don't we give him a few weeks in the next world and then he comes back and sees what kind of "Raymond Chops" this John Prentice kid has and hires him as his assistant?

Second choice would be Jeff Jones coming back in full "Idyll" mode and picking up right where HE (uh "she") left off.

Lithograph No.1: Neil Gaiman

EVIL DAVE SIM
JEFFREY FLAM:
If the shoe has ever been on the other foot, has a creators perceived personal politics ever stopped you from reading or caring about their work? Not asking to name names but given the whole evil Dave shenanigans wonder if that situation has ever been reversed for you.

DAVE SIM:
No, I've never been in the situation where I would Not Read someone else's work because of political or personal differences. At least part of that I think is because I've always known the work more than the person, whoever the person was. It would seem really weird to me to have someone's personal or political views get "in the way" of their work. It's either good work and worth looking at or it isn't. If it IS good work, how would you change your mind about it? I think you'd have to be dissociative by nature to be able to do that. To keep various Realities in different compartments in your head. "I liked this work in 1994 but then I had to stop liking it." How do you STOP liking something creative? Gives me the creeps to even think of thinking that way.

ERIC FENNESSEY:
Did the Neil Gaiman annual lithograph auction ever restart? My step-brother kindly got me the first one for my fortieth, but I've never seen another one offered.

DAVE SIM:
On the question about the Neil Gaiman Lithograph, no I'm afraid that was one of the casualties of the "I Don't Believe Dave Sim Is a Misogynist" petition. I thought, Neil of ALL people! Unfortunately the list of "of ALL people!" is as long as my arm. I'm very pleased to have the hand-rendered ones in the Archive that Neil did. I think he had a lot of fun doing them. There's definitely a frustrated artist very near Neil Gaiman's surface so the idea of a defacing a "lithograph" of himself with any medium he could think of (I think he borrowed a whole box of whatever-his-daughters were using at the time: glitter, sparkles, paints).

I've still got all of the un-doctored ones in the hall closet upstairs. Maybe things will change someday.

Cerebus Action Figure In Development

$
0
0
Cerebus: 3D-Printed Movie-Model
GEORGE PETER GATSIS:
(from the Kickstarter Q&A, 31 May 2014)
People, I am in production right now on creating a Cerebus Action Figure... FULLY articulated, right down to the fingers. It will stand about 8 inches tall. Have a helmet, a shield and a short sword. The Cerebus Action Figure Tail will be pose-able. Depending on where we stand on the print run of the action figure... It will most likely be a LIMITED AND NUMBERED run... Price to be determined.

UPDATE FROM GEORGE:
The model you see in this post is a modification of the CEREBUS MOVIE MODEL. While it's nice... it is far from Dave's approval for an action figure. So I am personally remodelling Cerebus to Dave's exact wants. When it's ready... I'll post something on CEREBUSDOWNLOADS.com.

Cerebus: 3D-Printed Movie-Model
DAVE SIM:
(from the Kickstarter Q&A, 31 May 2014)
I have to say that I don't know how much demand there will be for a Cerebus Action Figure. But then you never know. That's one of those things that a lot of people might be ordering in a purely "ironic" sense and then find out that they can't stop playing with it once they get it home. I sent George a number of notes on the figure and specified that whoever his "model-making guy" is would have to be cut in on the proceeds. I don't "do" work-made-for-hire as a publisher if I can help it. 

Cerebus: 3D-Printed Movie-Model

Sean's Lebonfon Printing Review

$
0
0
Previously on A Moment Of Cerebus:
DAVE SIM:
(from Weekly Update #33: Square One, 30 May 2014)
"Sean... you should have been sent an unbound copy of CEREBUS some time ago. Lebonfon, based on my own assessment of a year ago, makes the point that there are far fewer pages that need to be corrected on the CEREBUS volume than on the HIGH SOCIETY volume. So, one of the things that I'd like to hear from you is: do you think that's the case? Looking at the book as a fan of the cartooning on CEREBUS, as a fellow artist and someone already familiar with the book: as a fan of CEREBUS itself. I'm recommending a head-to-head comparison, going page by page with your own copy of the CEREBUS trade or with CEREBUS back issues or both..."
Montana Landscape
by Sean Michael Robinson
Hey Dave,

Well, I got the unbound Cerebus trade via FedEX on Monday, and spent many hours with it Monday and Tuesday.

Let me get the get to the take-away first -- I think you should go ahead and sell it as-is.

Before I start in here, let me define the terms, as on the last few back-and forths with George, things were getting a bit confused.
Bitmap-- a black and white, binary digital file (1-bit file). As the name bit suggests, every piece of information (pixel) is either on or off, black or white. This is as opposed to a grayscale file, which contains gradated information for each pixel.

Continuous tone-- any image, such as a photograph, that contains gradations of value, with some areas of tone being lighter or darker than others.

Raster-- an image file that contains pixel-specific information; this is as opposed to vector information, which exists as a drawing instruction rather than points in space. Any photograph or drawing will be represented digitally by a raster image.

RIP (Raster Image Processor)-- the workstation (or stand-alone piece of hardware) that converts supplied grayscale raster files into bitmap files appropriate for the platesetter.

Platesetter-- the machine that creates printing plates for an offset press.

Okay. So the biggest surprise for me when I opened the package was this -- even though George supplied grayscale files for the entire book, the majority of the pages were successfully converted to bitmap by the printer prior to printing. Every page that was sourced from the film negatives looks the same as it would have if George had just converted his grayscale files to bitmap himself prior to submitting the pages.

I have no way of knowing whether this was just really effective RIP settings/processing or whether Lebonfon has a really conscientious prepress person who was working on the job, but this essentially means that the majority of the book looks pretty good. (That was my mantra for a good five minutes, flipping through it. "Pretty good, pretty good.") There are other problems, but those are minor compared to the disaster that COULD have been here.

Left: Cerebus no moire-- a close-up of a portion of a Cerebus head and background figure from page 23, 
created by taking George's grayscale file and bit-map converting it so as to avoid half-toning.

Right: Cerebus moire-- A closeup of the same area, as it appears in the unbound printed copy.
The half-toning has created moire in the Cerebus tone, visible by the odd shapes the dots have turned into.

Some of you following along with the "bitmap or grayscale" cage match might be surprised to find that all grayscale files are converted to bitmap prior to creating a printing plate. That's because the printing plate doesn't DO gradation -- it only does on or off, i.e. binary. Either inked surface, or not inked surface. So when you supply a grayscale file for print, the RIP (and prepress operator) are making decisions about how best to convert. In the case of line-art, the person preparing the book is hopefully submitting them as bitmaps in the first place, avoiding the possibility of them accidentally being half-toned. In the case of continuous-tone images, like photographs, the images are half-toned, i.e. using dots to create the illusion of gray scale, using one of two common processes.

As a person who's had their line art illustrations half-toned against my will, I can tell you, it's not a pleasant experience to have your lines transform into dots.

BUT! That hasn't happened here for all of the pages that were sourced from the negatives. They all look exactly as if George had converted to bitmap before submission, despite their outer-edge gray pixels.

Which leaves the problem pages.

The real problem pages are, strangely enough, the ones that were sourced from scans of the original artwork. This is because these have been treated by George as continuous-tone images, rather than line art. By not contrast-adjusting the pages, he's preserved pencil marks, smudges, lettering guide lines, incomplete black ink coverage, incomplete white ink coverage, and other "details" of this nature.

This might be interesting in color, where the effect might create more of an illusion of texture of the original page, but for the most part, it's an oddity and a distraction here. It's also why the majority of these pages have moire on the Cerebus tone. One screen (Cerebus tone) through another screen (half-tone) = moire.

There are exceptions to this. I enjoyed a few of the Sump Thing pages w/ splatter and white ink, as it gave me a bit of a peek into the process of the drawing. But this was enjoyment as a cartoonist, not as a reader. I have to think that a reader would mostly wonder, "Why is this happening here? Why is he all fuzzy? And why did that only happen for a single page?" This approach might be great for an art book, in color, but it's awkward as a reading experience. Part of the whole charm of cartooning is that lineart, treated as line art, looks like text! There's a unity to the text elements and the line elements, like words and pictures are somehow the same thing, made of the same stuff. All of that goes away when you start to treat it like it's, I dunno, a photograph of a line art event.

That being said, despite the moire, which is inevitable given the nature of the files supplied, the half-toning actually looks really good! (You know, for half-toning). A really fine screen as well. I don't know if I've ever examined frequency modulated half-toning, which is what's happening here. It does a really great job of hiding from the eye, especially compared to the old stand-by process, now referred to as amplitude modulation. (The old process used fixed position dots of varying size. This new technique uses fixed sized dots that can move in position and amount.)

Own photoshop and what to play along at home? Open up any high-res grayscale document in PS.
For non-halftoning bitmap conversion, go to image → mode → bitmap, then select "50 % threshold"
For AM halftone, go to image → mode → bitmap, then select "halftone screen"
For FM halftone, go to image → mode → bitmap, then select "diffusion dither"
Anyway.

So. The other, comparatively minor, problems--

I'd say the Cerebus tone, and the overall cast of every page, has been way too aggressively lightened on maybe half the pages total. I've marked it in my copy, but really, there's no point in making a list—it's happening all over the place. Strangely enough, the tone is usually the right density on the pages worked on from original art, despite the moire -- presumably because George has done less density-adjustment on these.

The lightening has helped the duotone issue though -- I'd say that one has never looked better! The muddiness has mostly receded.

There's quite a bit of lightening of dense cross-hatching as well. I was confused before when I was talking to George about bitmap conversion and he kept on talking about "losing detail" in the dark areas. I now see what it is he was talking about, essentially, he seems to be lightening areas of dense cross-hatching so as to reduce fill-in and enlarge the space created between the hatched lines.

But to me, this sometimes changes the balance of the page, and diminishes the difference between solid black areas and the almost-solid black areas. You created these pages larger than the printed size, and then reduced them down. There will inevitably be some fill-in in dense cross-hatching. I don't think it does the artwork any favors to lighten all of this fill-in out of existence. (The exception being the early issues, which look pretty horrid and ink-clogged in the trades. These mostly benefit from the aggressive lightening.)

The pages overall are much lighter than originally, suggesting a need for much, much more one-off proofing while in process to insure the pages maintain the same balance as the originals.

Left: Resolution A-- a close-up of an area on page 97, from my 1994 era phone book, showing some smaller lines.

Right: Resolution B-- a close-up of that same area in the new printing, showing broken lines.
These are the effective limitations of 600 ppi.

The other problem is one of resolution of the source scans. The negatives I've seen have been scanned at 600 dpi, which is much too coarse to catch the finer lines. This problem starts at page 97, during the rain scene, and continues intermittently throughout the book, depending on how fine the lines were in the original pages.

(We also know now what will happen to teeny tiny tone at this low resolution. Take a look at the fine tone on page 240, bottom right panel. The fine tone has completely disappeared in this printing)

The only problem I really perceive with the actual printing is just the flatness of the black. I don't know if it's the ink density or the paper selection or what, but I would think that somewhere there's a better combination that would produce darker blacks.

All of these caveats aside, I think this book should probably go ahead as-is.

For a casual reader, these problems might be mild distractions, and they contribute to the already hodge-podge nature of the book. But I don't think any of them really warrant pulping the whole thing, at least, not if things are adjusted the next time the book comes up for print.

And for the non-casual reader, the inserted half-tone pages might be an interesting diversion from material they're already familiar with, even if they do exhibit moire.

There are books that come out all the time with more disastrous treatments. I'm thinking of Dororo, which came out from Vertical in 2008 or so. An entire book of fine line-art, perfectly prepped and adjusted, but then printed through a ridiculously coarse half-tone screen. Someone at the printer checked the wrong button on a dialogue box, and suddenly the whole book is a mess. Of course, they still sold it as-is. (They might not have if the rights holder had gotten a look at a copy beforehand...)

If you wanted to sweeten the pot a bit more, you could sign every book.

But if you were interested in replacing just a single signature or two, there are some choices.

These are the pages that I consider the worst, from a moire caused by half-tone standpoint--
13, 14, 18, 22, 23, 27, 39, 44, 120-128, 129, 130, 132-140, 296-303, 367, 417, 431, 435, 485, 522, 537 
So if you're replacing single signatures, that suggests these--
Signature 1-32 would eliminate 6 problem pages
Signature 97-128 would eliminate 10 problem pages
Signature 129-160 would eliminate 10 problem pages
Signature 289-320 would eliminate 8 problem pages
But, as I said, I think this will be an imperfect book either way, but not necessarily in a way that makes it unreadable. I think it might be a better strategy to just sell it and put then it on the back-burner for now, focus on the High Society rescue mission. That would at least break the jog-jam a bit, and buy some time for the next step.

I still think my suggested outline for action from two weeks ago is the right way forward. No manipulation, except where it's needed. Extremely high-res grayscale scans of the negative, where available, or of printed books, when the negative doesn't exist anymore. 2400 dpi. It's the resolution limitation of the platesetting process for many platesetters -- why not exploit it to the fullest? 600 dpi is woefully inadequate, even on this early material. And, most importantly, treating line art as line art. No futzing, no fussing, just a clean transfer.

Anyway, it's time to wrap this up. It was a good call sending me the book. Congrats again on the successful campaign! (I sent John a quick note/question re: the formatting for the portfolio. Let me know what you guys decide and I can make a few final suggestions/adjustments to the files before printing, namely, a little bit of sharpening.)

Best,

Sean

Sean Michael Robinson can be found online at Living The Line.

Weekly Update #34: We're On A Roll

$
0
0
DAVE SIM:
Hi Sean (and everybody!)

Tim faxed me your Wednesday post on Wednesday so I've had a couple of days to see what "sticks to my ribs".

This is much, much better news than I was even HOPING for.  How much better news?  I called my Diamond rep, Matt Demory to say "We aren't there yet, but we're much closer than I would ever have suspected we would be even a week ago."

Thanks, Sean, for the terminology recap.  I know the Luddite-inclined among us (not pointing fingers in any mirrors) are getting that "trigonometry feeling" a little too often for leisure-time reading.

Good news that you have kudos for Lebonfon's RIP and pre-press operator.  That takes "dump Lebonfon is Job One" off the table as far as I'm concerned.

I agree, in principle, that leaving in details that would otherwise be "contrast adjusted" constitutes an oddity (which I don't KNOW is a bad thing) and possibly a distraction (which could be a bad thing if we had a focus group to test it and most agreed it was, indeed, a distraction).

And I thought of the Woman Thing spatter pages right off when you said that.  I was really happy with those even though technically they're jarring next to the "non-original-art sourced" spatter pages.  But, that's part of what I took care of (in my own mind) with CEREBUS ARCHIVE THE ARTISTS EDITIONS.  God willing, those pages will be in CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER SEVENTEEN, so I don't have to concern myself.  You want that level of detail?  CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER SEVENTEEN is what you want to get.

The "flatness of the black" as you describe it, is what I was referring to when I said the overall impression of the book is "GREY"--not greyscale, half-tones, but bad ink coverage.  This is something we would definitely like to see fixed.  That might be a "royal we" or a "minority we" or "majority we" absent a focus group.  But, definitely a "heads up" to Lebonfon. Josee? Dean? This is something we -- all of us -- will be watching for.

Which brings us to "where now?"

I appreciate David Birdsong's observation in the comments...

(thank you David for Mended Fences'"hillbilly Jesus music" direct from Nashville which I got today.  Big laugh of the day:  "It's hillbilly Jesus music, but it's really GOOD hillbilly Jesus music".  It is indeed.  Toe-tappin' gospel Elvis and Jerry Lee and Johnny could have nailed at Sun Records. If the Off-White House has been bugged for my suspect Muslim sympathies somebiddy is done scratchin' his haid 'long about now at my Cranked Up To 11 iTunes hillbilly Jesus music whilst I was fixin' t'answer the mail) (y'all) (Quite a change from m'usual daid silence)

...and I certainly WANTED everything done on this book this time around, but I think that has to be balanced against the WASTE of just pulping the whole thing and starting from scratch -- as tempting as it is to spend all of your Kickstarter money as if I was a government bureau trying to drain my budget for fiscal year end.  And that I think there's going to be a natural split in the audience with a lot of people taking David's view: "I just can't see buying this if it's got residual flaws" and a lot of people eager to see what it is that we've been talking about.  The answer seems to me: "hang fire. The legacy edition will probably be the NEXT printing." Which might be, relatively speaking, just around the corner. And if you're really curious, you pays yer money and you get to decide fer your own self: oddity or distraction?  And is that a BAD thing (whichever one it is).  

And MOST people, I daresay, not really caring one way or the other.  We have, at best, a FEW retailers reading these Updates.  I think I'm safe in saying Unless we print half the pages upside down or pages 250-276 are from a porno comic (I wish I hadn't just said that), they're not REALLY interested:

CEREBUS is back in print? Fat city. What took so [effing] long?

That was one of the things that I presented to Matt at Diamond:  does Diamond want me to SOLICIT for the CEREBUS trade?  i.e. do a full page ad in PREVIEWS "FINALLY IT'S HERE!" kind of thing?  I mean, if anything is worth springing for an ad -- or a two-page spread (I was picturing the cover with inset images along the bottom half of high points of the restoration), that I could picture saying "Kids? Here's where Daddy's going to use up some Kickstarter bucks. 'Kay?" that would be it.

But, the first thing I asked him was "When's the next ad deadline for PREVIEWS?" And he checks and goes "Today." I laughed.  Well, okay, when's the NEXT one? And it's July 10 for items in the stores in November (I think).  Well, okay.  Obvious question:  do you want to wait until November?  

So, right now he's talking to people and I'm going to give him a call next Wednesday.  With pretty close to Zero Retailer Participation here, we're going to do it Diamond's way and ask "how high?" on the way up (as my Dad used to say).

But "where now?" as far as WE'RE concerned HERE:

Is...Sean? I think it makes sense to do the four signatures you suggest -- 1-32; 97-128; 129-160; 289-320 -- the best way YOU know how, billing Aardvark-Vanaheim for Your Best Shot.  And then -- fair's fair -- give them to George first to critique, as you got the chance to critique George's work.  And then when George has critiqued and tweaked -- or just left them alone -- those four signatures, we swap those files out with Lebonfon and be ready to print when I have a roadmap from Diamond --  "Here's what we want. Here's how many we'll take" -- and if it's A!S!A!P! then we have to be ready for that.  Or something in between -- not all the way to November, but with enough time to let the retailers know and get orders in an authorized back channel way that gives Diamond a ballpark figure and then they decide how many they want besides that.  And that's how many we print.

As someone pointed out, HIGH SOCIETY AUDIO DIGITAL is (theoretically) in stores in August and I couldn't fault Diamond for wanting A!S!A!P! to be as close to that as possible.

And, of course, then I complicated things by mentioning the "signed bookplates with Diamond logo as a Diamond exclusive on all CEREBUS trades ordered between -- Black Friday? Yes? and mid-December? Yes?"

Long silence on Matt's end. "EVERY book?"

Uh, well, yeah.  Without CEREBUS and HIGH SOCIETY, Diamond is sitting on A. Lot. Of. Dead. CEREBUS. Inventory.  Anything that moves some Christmas books that only requires me signing my name A. Bunch. Of. Times.  Uhh. You know:  Signatures R Us!

And then I had to complicate things even more by asking "or do you want the unsigned CEREBUS ARCHIVE NUMBER ONE in PREVIEWS in November for Christmas sales instead? Or 'as well'?" 

And if Dean or Josee is reading this:  can you send Sean an unbound copy of HIGH SOCIETY?

I think we're on a roll here.

Cover Recreation: Cerebus #11

$
0
0
Cerebus #11 (Original August 1979; Recreated 2010)
Art by Dave Sim
(Click image to enlarge)

Cerebus #11 - Behind The Scenes

$
0
0
Cerebus #11 (Hand-Colored Cover Proof, August 1979)
Art by Dave Sim
STEVE SWENSON:
(via email, 26 May 2014)
Been reading AMOC for several years now, first time responder. I bought this hand-colored cover proof on eBay several years ago. Not long after there was one of Dave's 're-imagined' re-creations for the cover listed on eBay; my guess is he did the re-creation in response to what this sold for -- conjecture on my part, but reasonable given the timing.

The Ed in the dedication seems to have had some nice early Cerebus art; within the past year a con poster art with a similar dedication sold on eBay and I also have a wonderful 1978 'sketch' to Ed -- I'll send an email with that one to you someday.

I have to wonder if there's other color proof examples out there, or were they destroyed, or in the Archives. Maybe you could get some input from Dave in this - he's got plenty of time on his hands, right? HA! 

Spawn: Crossing Over

$
0
0
Spawn Compendium Vol 1 (Image Comics, 2012)
by Todd McFarlane & Others
Collects Spawn #1-50 in black-and-white. With Spawn, writer and artist Todd McFarlane unleashed his iconic antihero on the world, and launched the most successful independent comic book in history. A government agent, Al Simmons was killed by his own men. Resurrected from the depths of hell, he returns to Earth as the warrior Spawn, guarding the forgotten alleys of New York City. As he seeks answers about his past, Spawn grapples with the dark forces that returned him to Earth, battling enemies and discovering unlikely allies. As he learns to harness his extraordinary new powers, he begins to grasp the full extent of what brought him back - and what he left behind. Spawn: Compendium 1 presents the stories and artwork that helped create the Spawn legacy - for the first time in glorious black and white. Features Todd McFarlane's legendary hyper-detailed art and stories, as well as collaborations with industry giants Greg Capullo (Batman), Alan Moore (Watchmen), Dave Sim (Cerebus), Marc Silvestri (Uncanny X-Men, Cyberforce), Frank Miller (Sin City) and Grant Morrison (Batman).

COMICS ALLIANCE:
(from Spawn: 20 Years Later by John Parker, 2 February 2012)
...Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman, Dave Sim, and Frank Miller four of the most-celebrated writers of the 1980s and early 1990s, took over Spawn from issues 8 to 11. Each contribution is significant and controversial in its own way. Moore was first, with "In Heaven", a basic Alan Moore Swamp Thing-like tale of child molester Billy Kincaid's trip through the Spheres of Hell. Not ground-breaking, but it served as Moore’s re-entry into superhero comics, which he had sworn off a few years before in favor of works like From Hell and Big Numbers. From here, Moore went on to work on Jim Lee's WildC.A.T.S., Rob Liefeld's Youngblood, Glory, and Supreme. Supreme was easily his best work in Liefeld's "Awesome Universe", an analogous take on Superman with masterful art by Rick Veitch that revived the thrill of invention of the Silver Age.

The next issue, written by Neil Gaiman, is the source of a long-running legal dispute between Gaiman and McFarlane, which concluded this week. The dispute centers around the ownership of the characters Angela, Medieval Spawn, and Cogliostro. Though Gaiman has always maintained they were created by him specifically for that one-issue story, McFarlane added them to Spawn lore when Gaiman wasn't looking. These were recurring characters, and ones that got their own toys, and appearances in the animated series and 1997 film. McFarlane's image as a champion of creator's rights was seriously tarnished, which was particularly ironic considering the subject of the next issue.

Dave Sim can be called many, many things, almost all of them true. In 1993, the word most-often used to describe the writer/artist was "genius". (Or Genius. Inside joke.) His then-fifteen-year-long, self-published Cerebus was the independent comic book of the era: beautiful, intelligent, experimental, and at a higher readership than ever before. Spawn readers had no idea. Sim's contribution to the Spawn legacy is easily the most compelling of the lot, delivering a story that is both dreamy and articulate. "Crossing Over" is an emotional/metaphysical plea for creator's rights that breaks the plane between fiction and reality.

After some of McFarlane's best work on the series in the depiction of Creator's Hell, Sim appears as Cerebus to extol the virtues of self-publishing to Spawn/McFarlane. There was a big response for the story, and somewhat prophetically of the title, many readers did in fact cross over to begin reading independent comics. Cerebus's readership jumped, and at just the perfect time: about a year before the infamous issue #186, which cemented Sim's reputation as a misogynist and cut his fanbase in half. Essentially, it gave Sim a bigger audience for his meltdown.

The last of the guest-written stories is issue 11, by Frank Miller, a collaboration that led to the Spawn/Batman crossover written by Miller and drawn by McFarlane. Even in retrospect, it exceeds expectations, and reads like a war poem performed by a coked-up caveman. While working on the project, McFarlane handed the reins over to Grant Morrison and Greg Capullo for three issues. In doing so, he became an administrator, and began his journey to entrepeneur...
Viewing all 5131 articles
Browse latest View live